Colin Casey v Bernard Conlon Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeals Tribunal (EAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDismissal
Respondent 1, Pat Roddy – respondent 2, Tony Matthews – respondent 3, Tony Roddy – respondent 4 and Lancorn BT Limited – respondent 5: where the claimant was a bar Manager in a bar that was leased by respondent 1. After a break-in at the bar and an argument with his employer there was a dispute whether the claimant had resigned. There was no appearance by or representation on behalf of the respondents. Thus, due to the uncontested evidence, the Tribunal awarded the claimant €30,303.00 under the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 to 2007.
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.