Lucyna Cierocke v Viking Lodge Hotel Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEquality Tribunal
Type of Claim / JurisdictionUnfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Equality, Pay and Conditions of Employment
In this case during the ‘protected period, under the Pregnant Workers Directive 92/85, the Equal Treatment Directive and sections 6 and 8 of the Employment Equality Acts.
The claimant had visited the workplace with her baby during her maternity leave. The Tribunal accepted the “consistent and credible accounts” of the respondent’s witnesses that some discussion took place over whether she could change her working hours and the manner of her future payment, although the complainant disputed this.
However, in line with decisions such as Parcourt Ltd t/a Café Viena v A Worker EED0211 and also
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.