Patrick Sheridan v Nurendale Limited t/a Panda Waste Services Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeals Tribunal (EAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionUnfair Dismissal, Disciplinary and Grievance Issues
The employee in this case appealed the recommendation of the Rights Commissioner.
The Tribunal heard evidence from the General Manager (the “GM”) of the respondent company.
According to the GM, since mid-2006, the appellant worked as a driver with the respondent company. The appellant did not have a contract of employment.
The GM informed the Tribunal that some issues arose with the appellant’s driving. He said that the appellant was sent home on two occasions as there was a smell of alcohol on his breath. In addition, there was an incident when a truck he was
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.