Elizabeth Sweeney v Aer Lingus Teo Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEquality Tribunal
Type of Claim / JurisdictionContracts of Employment, Policies and Procedures, Pay and Conditions of Employment
In this case, an Aer Lingus employee was awarded €5,000 by the Equality Tribunal, which concluded that management had failed to establish that her compulsory retirement at 65 years “served a legitimate aim, or purpose”.
In this case, Aer Lingus did not specify a specific retirement age in Ms. Sweeney’s contract of employment. Aer Lingus referred in their Defence to the terms of the occupational pension scheme and referred specifically to pension benefits which accrued at the age of 65 years. The claimant submitted that at no stage during her employment was it clearly communicated to her that
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.