Employee v Employer  UD842/2011Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeals Tribunal (EAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDismissal
The employee said she was an admin worker at farm with horses in Ireland, although her contract said she was a personal assistant and that her normal place of work would be in the office and part time in the yard. Certainly, she carried out a number of jobs. She resigned and claimed constructive dismissal after a series of fall-outs with the employer. The EAT appears to have preferred the claimant's evidence.
The EAT found "The cumulative actions of the respondent in the preceding year had resulted in a complete breakdown of trust and confidence on the part of the claimant in the respondent." and that it was "...satisfied that the claimant was entitled not to return to work when the
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.