Samaitas v Nurendale Ltd. T/A Panda Waste Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEquality Tribunal
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDiscrimination and Equality, Contracts of Employment
The complainant, who was legally represented, lodged three complaints with the Equality Tribunal. He accepted that he had been convicted in the District Court for driving without a valid and correct driving licence. He argued that since this only came to light after he lodged his complaints, even though it was clearly known to him before that, the Tribunal should proceed to investigate his complaints. It appears that “he deliberately deceived his employer by presenting it with a forged driving licence in respect of his appointment as a driver of large waste disposal
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.