Employee v Employer Posted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceIREAT UD2293/2011
Legal BodyEmployment Appeals Tribunal (EAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionUnfair Dismissal
The claimant was made redundant. He had been a Client Services Supervisor in a firm that owns and sells outdoor media space. However, he argued two other employees should have been considered in the redundancy pool. The claimant was off sick due to an accident at work at the time he was made redundant. The effect of the termination was that he was not actually assessed for the company’s permanent health insurance scheme which would have resulted in him receiving 2/3 of his income at no cost to the company.
The employer argued that because of the drop in business the level of work was impacted
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.