An Employer v A Worker (Represented by SIPTU) Posted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceIRLC Determination No. EDA 145
Legal BodyLabour Court
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDiscrimination and Equality
The Court had to decide whether or not the complainant was discriminatorily dismissed on the grounds of his disability and whether the respondent was in a position for the claimant to continue in employment. The complainant suffered from a series of brain haemorrhages which resulted in brain surgery, the complainant began to suffer from depression and developed an alcohol problem which resulted in him being medically diagnosed as an alcoholic. The complainant did not disclose his alcoholism to his employer but acknowledged that his employer was aware that he suffered with depression.
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.