Martin v Dunnes Stores (Dundalk) Limited  IECA 85Posted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceIECA 85
Legal BodyCourt of Appeal (IECA)
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
This case concerned injuries sustained by the applicant in the course of her employment whilst assisting a customer. The complainant argued that she had not been provided with a safe system of work nor adequate training, thus resulting in her tearing a muscle in her arm. The Court accepted that the defendant had a system in place to deal with customer queries etc, which on the facts the applicant failed to comply with. The Court held that the company policy and procedure, which relied on the use of a tannoy, was sufficient to accommodate for situations similar to what occurred on the day, meaning that no breach of duty had arisen.
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.