Kratzer v R & V Allgemeine Versicherung AG

• Case Reference

  CJEU C‑423/15

• Legal Body

  Court of Justice EU (CJEU/ECJ)

• Type of Claim / Jurisdiction

  Discrimination, Tribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues

The Kratzer v R+V Allegemeine Versicherung AG [2016] case was also reviewed by Scott Alexander, Head of L&D at Legal-Island here.

Vexatious litigants have troubled the legal system from as far back as the late nineteenth century prompting the introduction in the United Kingdom of the “Vexatious Actions Act 1896” known as “an Act to prevent the abuse of the process of the High Court and other courts by the institution of vexatious legal proceedings”.[1] This Act gave leave to the Attorney General to apply to the High Court (and other courts) for an Order prohibiting an individual from issuing legal proceedings without leave from the court, not unlike the use of the Isaac Wunder

Login

Login to your legal island account

Email Address Password

Remember me

Lost password?

Not registered with us?

Register

Already a subscriber?

Click here to login and access the full article.

Log in now to read the full article

Don't miss out, register today!

Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.

We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.

We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.

You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.

You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.

Already a subscriber, log in now or Register