A Store v A Worker Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyLabour Court
Type of Claim / JurisdictionSickness and Absence, Discrimination and Equality
This case involved an employee who was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis during the course of her employment. Following her diagnosis, she went on sick leave.
A year later her GP certified her as fit to return to work, conditional on her being put in an alternative role more suited to her condition. However, the employer stated that she would have to be certified fully fit to perform her current role in the bakery department in order to return to work. Accordingly, the complainant did not return to work.
The Court held that employers have an obligation to consider reasonable accommodation of
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.