Teagasc Agriculture and Food Development Authority v Dr Douglas Sorenson Posted In: Case Law
Decision NumberILCR Determination No. EDA1723
Legal BodyLabour Court
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDiscrimination and Equality, Tribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
This case involved a claim that the complainant was discriminated against on the age ground. The Court had to deal with a preliminary issue which involved the fact that the legal arguments in this case had already been rejected by the Labour Court in related proceedings under the Protection of Employees (Fixed Term Work) Act 2003.
The respondent submitted that the complainant should not be allowed to re-open these facts and legal arguments for the proceedings at hand. The complainant alleged that different issues of law arose in these proceedings and the doctrine of res judicata had no application in this case.
The Court noted that the complainant had been invited by the Labour Court to
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.