Daifuku American Corporation v Brian Mc Caffrey Posted in: Case Law
Legal BodyLabour Court
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
This case concerned a claim for unfair dismissal. Difficulties arose in 2015 between the parties in relation to changes to the appellant's working and on-call hours. The fact of dismissal was not in dispute but the appellant claimed he had been unfairly dismissed, whereas the respondent claimed the position had been made redundant. The case therefore centred on the appellant's willingness to continue to work on-call when his working week increased from 4 days a week to 5 days a week.
The Court noted that the respondent's lack of clarity in defining the role which was 'made redundant' was
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.