Bruce Betting t/a GT Retail v A Worker Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyLabour Court
Type of Claim / JurisdictionCollective and Trade Union Issues
The Complainant submitted her complaint to the Labour Court under the Industrial Relations Act. The Complainant submitted that she had been dismissed by the Respondent on the basis that her position was being made redundant. She stated that her position was subsequently advertised and shortly after her position within the company was filled. The Complainant contended that the decision to advertise and subsequently offer her position to another person was contrary to undertakings given at the time of her dismissal as she was not offered re-employment in the first instance. Additionally,
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.