Probation ManagementPosted in : HR Updates ROI on 23 September 2022
Probation Management can be viewed as an extension of the recruitment and selection process. A Probation Period is a time period at the beginning of employment which allows the employer to assess the employee’s suitability for the role and address any performance related issues, early in the employment. During the probationary period, it is easier for an employer to end an employee’s employment due to under performance, as they do not have the protection of the Unfair Dismissals Acts until they reach 12 months service. Nevertheless, employers should follow best practice guidelines for probation management to avoid complaints under the Industrial Relations legislation.
A probationary clause should be outlined in an employee’s contract and should state the length of the employee’s probation period. On average, an employee’s probation period is between 6 months and 11 months. It is important to note, the probationary period cannot exceed 12 months, including the notice period, which is a requirement after the employee has completed 13 weeks of service with the company. Although an employer is not obligated to provide an employee with notice of their contract being terminated prior to their 13 weeks of service being completed, it is best practice to give an employee at least one weeks’ notice if they are deemed unsuitable for the role, they are in.
On completion of 13 weeks of service, the notice period during the employee’s probation period cannot be less than that outlined under the terms of the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Acts, 1973-2005. Under this act an employer is required to give an employee one week’s notice when terminating this employment, if the employee has been employed for 13 weeks to 2 years.
In the case where an employee’s probationary period exceeds 12 months, an employee could potentially bring a claim under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977-2015, if an employee feels that they have been unfairly dismissed. For example, an employee would have recourse under this legislation if they were dismissed upon reaching 11 months and 3 weeks service, as the 1 week notice period could be included in the calculation of length of service and this would bring the employee up to 12 months service, giving them recourse under the act. As this act entitles employees to take a claim after 12 months of continuous service, the maximum probation period length recommended is 11 months.
Probation reviews which are conducted throughout the probation period allow for an employer to assess the employee’s suitability for the role and match for the Company. Therefore, during an employee’s probation period, an employer should be meeting the employee on a regular basis. For example, if the employee’s probation period is 6 months, the employer should schedule a meeting with the employee on month 1, month 3 and month 6. The purpose of formal probation meetings is to offer feedback on the various aspects of the employee’s performance by explaining both the areas where they are excelling, and areas where improvement is needed.
The following steps can be used to successfully carry out a probation review:
- Invite the employee to their probation review by sending a letter via email.
- During the meeting, an employee should be provided with constructive feedback:
- The employer should begin by outlining the positive aspects of the employee’s performance and give an example/examples.
- The employer should explain the area/s the employee needs to improve in and provide an example/examples.
- The employer should outline goals that they would like the employee to achieve by the next probation review meeting.
- The employer should assure the employee that they will provide them with any support and assistance that will help them reach the standard expected of them.
- During the first probation review meeting, it is important to inform the employee that the employer/manager has the option to extend the probation period if they feel it is necessary but that this will not exceed 11 months. An employer should also outline that the employee may be at risk of failing their probation period if their performance does not reach the standards required for the role.
- After each probation review meeting, it is important to draft and send a follow up letter to the employee with a detailed summary of what was discussed in the probation review meeting.
If an employee failed to reach the standard required and the employer has followed the above recommendations, the employee should be invited to a final probation review meeting where the employer informs the employee that their contract of employment is being terminated. It is important to note that the invite should clearly outline that the potential outcome of the meeting may be that the employee has failed their probation period. This will ensure that the failure of their probation/termination does not come as a shock to the employee during their final probationary meeting. The employer should issue the employee with a final follow up letter outlining all the aspect of performance that were not improved upon, final date, notice period, reference for future employer, and a statement that any accrual of annual leave will be paid.
An important learning has emerged from the Over- C- Technology case. The employee’s contract contained a clause which allowed his employment to be terminated for no reason during his probation period. It would be important that employers adopt this clause in employment contracts going forward. The Court of Appeal’s decision restores our understanding of probationary processes, in that it confirms that:
- The employee can be terminated on probation on performance grounds without the need to afford fair procedures and natural justice
- The employee is entitled to fair procedures and natural justice if he/she is terminated for misconduct, even if the employee is still on probation
Termination of a contract is permitted for poor performance and fair procedures shall not apply. However, it would be vital that employers continue to adhere to good HR practices as outlined above. In cases of misconduct or gross misconduct, it is not the probation process that should be used but rather the disciplinary procedure, and fair procedure and natural justice should apply.This article is correct at 23/09/2022
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.