Dr David L. Parris v Trinity College Dublin (C-443/15), Opinion of AG KokottPosted in : Labour & Superior Court Case Law Review Panel on 4 August 2016
For example in Hill and Stapleton v Revenue Commissioners (C-243/95) the ECJ, as it was then, was asked to consider whether indirect discrimination on grounds of gender lay in the context of a job share working arrangement, in McKenna v North Western Health Board (C-191/03), the issue which arose for consideration was whether the treatment of pregnancy-related illness in the same way as ordinary illness constituted sex discrimination and more recently in Impact v Minister for Agriculture and Food (C-268/06), the Court of Justice examined the direct effects of certain provisions within the
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Irish Employment Law Hub? We help thousands of people like you understand how the latest changes in Irish employment law impact your business through a mix of case law analysis and in-depth articles. All delivered right to your inbox.
We help you to understand the ramifications of each important case from Ireland and Europe.
We help you ensure that your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with Irish law.
You will receive regular updates on Irish employment law including case law reviews, legislative changes, topical updates as well as answers to your burning questions through our Q&A feature.
You will have 24/7 access to the Employment Law Hub so you can research case law and HR issues when you need to.
This article is correct at 04/08/2016
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.